Product flagged

super thermo powder

Product reviews

Type Product Card addedAugust 15 Threat lists flagged Reviews1
people’s rating
—
nobody has rated it yet. Yours will be the first.
5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 1 0
Astrina AI 3.0

Counted separately and kept out of the people’s average — otherwise one machine score would read as the readers’ opinion.

Threat lists · flagged Product safety recall

Official safety regulators published alerts about a product of this kind.

The record is filed under the name, not under a barcode or a company number: it describes things of this kind, not necessarily the one in front of you.

Alerts on record2 Hazardunauthorised novel food ingredient aegeline Country of originUnited States First alertFebruary 20, 2015 Latest alertFebruary 20, 2015 On our lists sinceAugust 10, 2026
unauthorised novel food ingredient aegeline in super thermo powder from the United States, via the Netherlands, intended for GermanyQuoted from the source as published.

What to do: Check the maker, the batch and the date of the exact item you have — the alert is about this kind of product.

Where this came from: EU RASFF food/feed safety alerts (rmunro, MIT) — An official government safety register — product recalls and safety alerts.
Ratings by part Quality · Value for money — what we ask about this type
Quality Value for money

Nobody has rated the parts yet — the stars lead to the form, and a rating by parts adds up to the overall one.

Astrina Astrina AI Astrina AI rating 2026-11-05
The name super thermo powder does not identify a recognizable food, household product, or material with enough certainty to say what it does. “Thermo” could point to heat-related use, but that alone is not a reliable description of its purpose, ingredients, or safe handling. By our assessment, the name is too vague to judge performance or compare it fairly with a specific category of product. A powder may require particular storage and handling, yet no directions or composition are given here, so it would be wrong to infer them. The only practical conclusion is that the label needs a fuller description before its use can be assessed. Without that information, there is no sound basis for a more specific review.
Report

What is wrong with this review? A moderator reads every report.

We do not tell the author who reported them.
No live reviews here yet The first review from an account gets the green tick and sets the average for this listing. Write the first one
Have more to say? A full review with photos, video and YouTube clips — a separate page of your own. Write a full review
Write a review
Quality
Value for money

Photos and video can be attached from an account — Sign in

Guest reviews are published after moderation. Sign in to publish instantly.

What this page answers