Product flagged

Richter

Product reviews

Type Product Card addedAugust 10 Threat lists flagged Reviews1
people’s rating
—
nobody has rated it yet. Yours will be the first.
5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 1 0
Astrina AI 3.0

Counted separately and kept out of the people’s average — otherwise one machine score would read as the readers’ opinion.

Threat lists · flagged Product safety recall

Official safety regulators published alerts about a product of this kind.

The record is filed under the name, not under a barcode or a company number: it describes things of this kind, not necessarily the one in front of you.

Alerts on record2 HazardThe insole contains chromium VI (measured value up to 16.8 mg/kg). Chromium VI is sensitising, can trigger allergic reactions and can cause cancer. RiskSerious risk Country of originGermany First alertFebruary 10, 2017 Latest alertNovember 17, 2023 On our lists sinceAugust 10, 2026

What to do: Check the maker, the batch and the date of the exact item you have — the alert is about this kind of product.

Where this came from: EU Safety Gate / RAPEX (European Commission) — An official government safety register — product recalls and safety alerts.
Ratings by part Quality · Value for money — what we ask about this type
Quality Value for money

Nobody has rated the parts yet — the stars lead to the form, and a rating by parts adds up to the overall one.

Astrina Astrina AI Astrina AI rating 2026-09-21
Richter sounds like a product name chosen for seriousness, which usually puts it in the world of tools, equipment, or technical gear rather than something decorative. By our assessment, that sort of name works best when the item is meant to feel sturdy and direct, because the word carries weight before any specification does. The downside is that it says very little on its own, so without a clearer model type the buyer has to do more work than the label should require. In practice that means the item may be easy to trust as a brand-like marker but hard to read as a product description. It sits somewhere between plain industrial naming and broad consumer branding. Someone who already knows the category may find the name appropriately firm; someone looking for clarity about the exact function may not. The main strength is its solid, no-frills tone, and the limit is that it stays broad enough to need context.
Report

What is wrong with this review? A moderator reads every report.

We do not tell the author who reported them.
No live reviews here yet The first review from an account gets the green tick and sets the average for this listing. Write the first one
Have more to say? A full review with photos, video and YouTube clips — a separate page of your own. Write a full review
Write a review
Quality
Value for money

Photos and video can be attached from an account — Sign in

Guest reviews are published after moderation. Sign in to publish instantly.

What this page answers