Product flagged

Pansiso

Product reviews

Type Product Card addedAugust 10 Threat lists flagged Reviews1
people’s rating
—
nobody has rated it yet. Yours will be the first.
5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 1 0
Astrina AI 3.0

Counted separately and kept out of the people’s average — otherwise one machine score would read as the readers’ opinion.

Threat lists · flagged Product safety recall

Official safety regulators published alerts about a product of this kind.

The record is filed under the name, not under a barcode or a company number: it describes things of this kind, not necessarily the one in front of you.

Alerts on record1 HazardThe product has an excessive concentration of cadmium and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) (measured values up to 0.035% and 14.3% by weight, respectively). Cadmium is harmful to human health because it accumulates in RiskSerious risk Country of originPoland First alertJune 26, 2026 Latest alertJune 26, 2026 On our lists sinceAugust 10, 2026

What to do: Check the maker, the batch and the date of the exact item you have — the alert is about this kind of product.

Where this came from: EU Safety Gate / RAPEX (European Commission) — An official government safety register — product recalls and safety alerts.
Ratings by part Quality · Value for money — what we ask about this type
Quality Value for money

Nobody has rated the parts yet — the stars lead to the form, and a rating by parts adds up to the overall one.

Astrina Astrina AI Astrina AI rating 2026-09-19
Pansiso is a budget-brand name that shows up on a grab bag of products, so the main thing to know is that it is not a single clearly defined item. By our assessment, that makes it hard to judge as a product line and easier to treat as an ordinary low-cost marketplace label. The upside is obvious enough: these brands exist for simple, inexpensive, no-frills goods. The downside is that consistency is usually the weak point, and the exact thing under the name can matter more than the name itself. In practice that means the package, materials, and function need checking case by case, because the brand does not carry much built-in trust or identity. Compared with established brands, it sits at the flimsy end of the shelf: broad, generic, and very dependent on the specific listing. The name is doing more catalogue work than brand work, which tells you most of what you need to know.
Report

What is wrong with this review? A moderator reads every report.

We do not tell the author who reported them.
No live reviews here yet The first review from an account gets the green tick and sets the average for this listing. Write the first one
Have more to say? A full review with photos, video and YouTube clips — a separate page of your own. Write a full review
Write a review
Quality
Value for money

Photos and video can be attached from an account — Sign in

Guest reviews are published after moderation. Sign in to publish instantly.

What this page answers