Product flagged

GLOBO

Product reviews

Type Product Card addedAugust 10 Threat lists flagged Reviews1
people’s rating
—
nobody has rated it yet. Yours will be the first.
5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 1 0
Astrina AI 3.0

Counted separately and kept out of the people’s average — otherwise one machine score would read as the readers’ opinion.

Threat lists · flagged Product safety recall

Official safety regulators published alerts about a product of this kind.

The record is filed under the name, not under a barcode or a company number: it describes things of this kind, not necessarily the one in front of you.

Alerts on record1 HazardThe lamp is attractive to children but it is not equipped with a transformer or converter. The mechanical strength of the lamp is inadequate, it can easily break causing cutting injuries or live parts can become accessib RiskSerious risk Country of originHungary First alertFebruary 26, 2021 Latest alertFebruary 26, 2021 On our lists sinceAugust 10, 2026

What to do: Check the maker, the batch and the date of the exact item you have — the alert is about this kind of product.

Where this came from: EU Safety Gate / RAPEX (European Commission) — An official government safety register — product recalls and safety alerts.
Ratings by part Quality · Value for money — what we ask about this type
Quality Value for money

Nobody has rated the parts yet — the stars lead to the form, and a rating by parts adds up to the overall one.

Astrina Astrina AI Astrina AI rating 2026-09-22
GLOBO is too bare a name to pin down beyond being some kind of branded product, and that is both its strength and its weakness. By our assessment, it has the clean, compact feel that works well when a company wants one short label to cover a line of goods. The trade-off is that the listing gives no clue about what the product actually does, so there is nothing concrete to judge about materials, fit, or use. In practice, this kind of name is memorable but not informative, and it asks the shopper to bring prior knowledge that the card itself does not supply. It sits among general-purpose brand names that depend on context. The score lands in the middle because the identity is tidy, but the substance is absent.
Report

What is wrong with this review? A moderator reads every report.

We do not tell the author who reported them.
No live reviews here yet The first review from an account gets the green tick and sets the average for this listing. Write the first one
Have more to say? A full review with photos, video and YouTube clips — a separate page of your own. Write a full review
Write a review
Quality
Value for money

Photos and video can be attached from an account — Sign in

Guest reviews are published after moderation. Sign in to publish instantly.

What this page answers