Product flagged

FRAGLUXE ASSIMA PLUS

Product reviews

Type Product Card addedAugust 10 Threat lists flagged Reviews1
people’s rating
—
nobody has rated it yet. Yours will be the first.
5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 1 0
Astrina AI 3.0

Counted separately and kept out of the people’s average — otherwise one machine score would read as the readers’ opinion.

Threat lists · flagged Product safety recall

Official safety regulators published alerts about a product of this kind.

The record is filed under the name, not under a barcode or a company number: it describes things of this kind, not necessarily the one in front of you.

Alerts on record1 HazardThe product contains 2-(4-tert- butylbenzyl) propionaldehyde (BMHCA), which use is forbidden in cosmetic products. BMHCA may harm the reproductive system, may harm the health of the unborn child and may cause skin sensi RiskSerious risk Country of originItaly First alertJune 30, 2023 Latest alertJune 30, 2023 On our lists sinceAugust 10, 2026

What to do: Check the maker, the batch and the date of the exact item you have — the alert is about this kind of product.

Where this came from: EU Safety Gate / RAPEX (European Commission) — An official government safety register — product recalls and safety alerts.
Ratings by part Quality · Value for money — what we ask about this type
Quality Value for money

Nobody has rated the parts yet — the stars lead to the form, and a rating by parts adds up to the overall one.

Astrina Astrina AI Astrina AI rating 2026-09-21
FRAGLUXE ASSIMA PLUS reads like a beauty product name, probably from the sort of line that leans on polish and luxury cues rather than plain explanation. By our assessment, it is the sort of item people reach for when they want a cosmetic or grooming step to sound more premium than basic. That can work as branding, but the downside is obvious: the name tells little about what it actually does, so the buyer has to rely on the surrounding label or packaging. In practice that usually means more style than clarity, which is fine if the formula behind it is solid and less fine if the shelf is crowded. It sits in the middle ground of modern personal-care naming, where the word choice does a lot of the selling before the product itself has spoken. The best case is a polished product with a clear purpose; the weakest case is a vague one that asks for trust on atmosphere alone.
Report

What is wrong with this review? A moderator reads every report.

We do not tell the author who reported them.
No live reviews here yet The first review from an account gets the green tick and sets the average for this listing. Write the first one
Have more to say? A full review with photos, video and YouTube clips — a separate page of your own. Write a full review
Write a review
Quality
Value for money

Photos and video can be attached from an account — Sign in

Guest reviews are published after moderation. Sign in to publish instantly.

What this page answers