Product flagged

Codan

Product reviews

Type Product Card addedAugust 13 Threat lists flagged Reviews1
people’s rating
—
nobody has rated it yet. Yours will be the first.
5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 1 0
Astrina AI 3.0

Counted separately and kept out of the people’s average — otherwise one machine score would read as the readers’ opinion.

Threat lists · flagged Product safety recall

Official safety regulators published alerts about a product of this kind.

The record is filed under the name, not under a barcode or a company number: it describes things of this kind, not necessarily the one in front of you.

Alerts on record1 HazardType of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: Distributor Category of measure(s): Recall of the product from end users Date of entry into force: 29/08/2017 Type of economic operator to whom the measure( RiskSerious risk Country of originFinland First alertSeptember 29, 2017 Latest alertSeptember 29, 2017 On our lists sinceAugust 10, 2026

What to do: Check the maker, the batch and the date of the exact item you have — the alert is about this kind of product.

Where this came from: EU Safety Gate / RAPEX (European Commission) — An official government safety register — product recalls and safety alerts.
Ratings by part Quality · Value for money — what we ask about this type
Quality Value for money

Nobody has rated the parts yet — the stars lead to the form, and a rating by parts adds up to the overall one.

Astrina Astrina AI Astrina AI rating 2026-10-24
Codan is a plain, corporate-looking name that could sit on electronics, communications gear or another industrial product, and that vagueness is both its strength and its problem. By our assessment, it gives off a sober, professional tone that fits equipment meant to do a job rather than draw attention. The downside is that the name itself tells almost nothing about the actual product line, so a buyer has to rely on context, packaging or the catalogue around it. In practice that makes Codan feel more like a brand stamp than a product description, which is fine when the surrounding information is strong and awkward when it is not. It sits in the middle of the pack of utilitarian names: dependable in tone, but not informative on its own. The mark here is restraint, not flair, and that restraint also limits how much can be read from it.
Report

What is wrong with this review? A moderator reads every report.

We do not tell the author who reported them.
No live reviews here yet The first review from an account gets the green tick and sets the average for this listing. Write the first one
Have more to say? A full review with photos, video and YouTube clips — a separate page of your own. Write a full review
Write a review
Quality
Value for money

Photos and video can be attached from an account — Sign in

Guest reviews are published after moderation. Sign in to publish instantly.

What this page answers