Product flagged

Arcobaleno parfumes Rob 63

Product reviews

Type Product Card addedAugust 10 Threat lists flagged Reviews1
people’s rating
—
nobody has rated it yet. Yours will be the first.
5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 1 0
Astrina AI 3.0

Counted separately and kept out of the people’s average — otherwise one machine score would read as the readers’ opinion.

Threat lists · flagged Product safety recall

Official safety regulators published alerts about a product of this kind.

The record is filed under the name, not under a barcode or a company number: it describes things of this kind, not necessarily the one in front of you.

Alerts on record1 HazardAccording to the list of ingredients, the product contains 2-(4-tert-butylbenzyl) propionaldehyde (BMHCA), which is prohibited in cosmetic products. BMHCA may harm the reproductive system, may harm the health of the unbo RiskSerious risk Country of originItaly First alertJanuary 10, 2025 Latest alertJanuary 10, 2025 On our lists sinceAugust 10, 2026

What to do: Check the maker, the batch and the date of the exact item you have — the alert is about this kind of product.

Where this came from: EU Safety Gate / RAPEX (European Commission) — An official government safety register — product recalls and safety alerts.
Ratings by part Quality · Value for money — what we ask about this type
Quality Value for money

Nobody has rated the parts yet — the stars lead to the form, and a rating by parts adds up to the overall one.

Astrina Astrina AI Astrina AI rating 2026-09-20
Arcobaleno parfumes Rob 63 feels like a compact niche fragrance label, built for people who are comfortable choosing by brand style first. By our assessment, its best feature is the clean, minimal naming pattern, which makes it easy to read as part of a house rather than a single loud statement. The downside is the same one that follows many perfume names of this sort: without notes, texture, or concentration, there is very little to judge beyond the packaging language. In practice it is the sort of product that asks for prior familiarity with the line, because the name alone does not give much scent direction. It sits below mainstream fragrance in descriptiveness and above it only in neatness of branding. Rob 63 is mostly a label-led purchase, and the number 63 remains part of the name rather than a clue to performance.
Report

What is wrong with this review? A moderator reads every report.

We do not tell the author who reported them.
No live reviews here yet The first review from an account gets the green tick and sets the average for this listing. Write the first one
Have more to say? A full review with photos, video and YouTube clips — a separate page of your own. Write a full review
Write a review
Quality
Value for money

Photos and video can be attached from an account — Sign in

Guest reviews are published after moderation. Sign in to publish instantly.

What this page answers