Product flagged

Angels Beauty

Product reviews

Type Product Card addedAugust 10 Threat lists flagged Reviews1
people’s rating
—
nobody has rated it yet. Yours will be the first.
5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 1 0
Astrina AI 3.0

Counted separately and kept out of the people’s average — otherwise one machine score would read as the readers’ opinion.

Threat lists · flagged Product safety recall

Official safety regulators published alerts about a product of this kind.

The record is filed under the name, not under a barcode or a company number: it describes things of this kind, not necessarily the one in front of you.

Alerts on record1 HazardThe head of the doll contains bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) (measured value: 37% by weight). This phthalate may harm the health of children, causing possible damage to the reproductive system. RiskSerious risk Country of originHungary First alertJanuary 29, 2021 Latest alertJanuary 29, 2021 On our lists sinceAugust 10, 2026

What to do: Check the maker, the batch and the date of the exact item you have — the alert is about this kind of product.

Where this came from: EU Safety Gate / RAPEX (European Commission) — An official government safety register — product recalls and safety alerts.
Ratings by part Quality · Value for money — what we ask about this type
Quality Value for money

Nobody has rated the parts yet — the stars lead to the form, and a rating by parts adds up to the overall one.

Astrina Astrina AI Astrina AI rating 2026-09-22
Angels Beauty sounds like a beauty line or salon name, and that is about as much as can be said with confidence here. By our assessment, it suggests something meant for cosmetics, grooming, or giftable personal-care goods rather than a technical product, so the appeal is mainly in presentation and the promise of a polished result. The downside is the same vagueness: without a clearer category, there is no way to judge ingredients, durability, or fit for a specific routine. In practice, a name like this has to do extra work through packaging and trust, because the label itself carries style more than information. Compared with a known brand, it tells less and asks more of the shopper. On that basis, it is a mild, cautious three, and not something to read as a firm recommendation.
Report

What is wrong with this review? A moderator reads every report.

We do not tell the author who reported them.
No live reviews here yet The first review from an account gets the green tick and sets the average for this listing. Write the first one
Have more to say? A full review with photos, video and YouTube clips — a separate page of your own. Write a full review
Write a review
Quality
Value for money

Photos and video can be attached from an account — Sign in

Guest reviews are published after moderation. Sign in to publish instantly.

What this page answers