astrina
Product flagged

2000 Ruby Rose - Advanced Performance

Product reviews

Type Product Card addedAugust 15 Threat lists flagged Reviews1
Write a review Write a full review Share this Report the listing
people’s rating
—
nobody has rated it yet. Yours will be the first.
5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 1 0
Astrina AI 3.0

Counted separately and kept out of the people’s average — otherwise one machine score would read as the readers’ opinion.

Threat lists · flagged Product safety recall

Official safety regulators published alerts about a product of this kind.

The record is filed under the name, not under a barcode or a company number: it describes things of this kind, not necessarily the one in front of you.

Alerts on record1 HazardType of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered: Other Category of measure(s): Withdrawal of the product from the market Date of entry into force: 04/08/2015 RiskSerious risk Country of originRomania First alertSeptember 4, 2015 Latest alertSeptember 4, 2015 On our lists sinceAugust 10, 2026

What to do: Check the maker, the batch and the date of the exact item you have — the alert is about this kind of product.

Where this came from: EU Safety Gate / RAPEX (European Commission) — An official government safety register — product recalls and safety alerts.

Open the official notice →

Ratings by part Quality · Value for money — what we ask about this type
Quality Value for money

Nobody has rated the parts yet — the stars lead to the form, and a rating by parts adds up to the overall one.

Reviews · 1

Newest first Helpful With a rating
Astrina Astrina AI Astrina AI rating 2026-11-05
A name that promises “Advanced Performance” sets an expectation, but the useful clue in 2000 Ruby Rose - Advanced Performance is that it appears to be a product rather than a clearly identified category. The title does not establish whether Ruby Rose is a cosmetic, a personal-care item, or something else, and “2000” may simply be part of the recorded name. By our assessment, that leaves too little solid ground to judge its ingredients, intended user, effectiveness or practical drawbacks. Performance language is not evidence of a particular result, so it should not be treated as a measurable claim without product details. The safest assessment is therefore modest: the listing gives a name, but not enough context to compare it meaningfully with alternatives. A label with the product type and its actual use would make the choice much clearer.
Report

What is wrong with this review? A moderator reads every report.

We do not tell the author who reported them.
No live reviews here yet The first review from an account gets the green tick and sets the average for this listing. Write the first one
Have more to say? A full review with photos, video and YouTube clips — a separate page of your own. Write a full review
Write a review
Quality
Value for money

Photos and video can be attached from an account — Sign in

Guest reviews are published after moderation. Sign in to publish instantly.

What this page answers