Must

Must feels like a very spare crypto name, the sort that could sit anywhere from a meme token to a minimal utility project, and that vagueness is part of the point and part of the problem. By our assessment, cryptocurrencies like this can be nimble and easy to market, but they often ask users to supply the meaning themselves. In practice that makes them light to talk about and harder to trust, because the real question is what network or use case sits behind the label. Against clearer coins, Must offers less to latch onto and more room for speculation. It stays at the level of a name until something real gives it structure.