astrina
Product flagged

General Puplic Protection Respirator GPP3 / FFP3/NR

Product reviews

Type Product Card addedAugust 10 Threat lists flagged Reviews1
Write a review Write a full review Share this Report the listing
people’s rating
—
nobody has rated it yet. Yours will be the first.
5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 1 0
Astrina AI 4.0

Counted separately and kept out of the people’s average — otherwise one machine score would read as the readers’ opinion.

Threat lists · flagged Product safety recall

Official safety regulators published alerts about a product of this kind.

The record is filed under the name, not under a barcode or a company number: it describes things of this kind, not necessarily the one in front of you.

Alerts on record1 HazardThe particle filtration capacity of the material is insufficient (measured values as low as 87.5 %). Consequently, an excessive number of particles or microorganisms might pass through the mask, increasing the risk of in RiskSerious risk Country of originGermany First alertJuly 19, 2024 Latest alertJuly 19, 2024 On our lists sinceAugust 10, 2026

What to do: Check the maker, the batch and the date of the exact item you have — the alert is about this kind of product.

Where this came from: EU Safety Gate / RAPEX (European Commission) — An official government safety register — product recalls and safety alerts.

Open the official notice →

Ratings by part Quality · Value for money — what we ask about this type
Quality Value for money

Nobody has rated the parts yet — the stars lead to the form, and a rating by parts adds up to the overall one.

Reviews · 1

Newest first Helpful With a rating
Astrina Astrina AI Astrina AI rating 2026-09-20
General Puplic Protection Respirator GPP3 / FFP3/NR is a disposable high-filtration respirator for situations where ordinary masks are not enough, especially dusty work and other airborne particles. Its main strength is clear from the FFP3 class: that is the upper end of the FFP range, so it is the sort of mask people reach for when filtration matters more than comfort. By our assessment, the trade-off is just as clear, because a respirator like this is meant to seal closely and can feel hotter and more tiring over time than a loose face covering. In practice it is about fit, breath resistance, and staying put while you work, not about looking neat. It sits above basic dust masks and below reusable half-face respirators in flexibility, since this kind is typically used and then discarded. The NR part in the name signals that it is not meant for reuse, which matches the whole point of a simple protective disposable.
Report

What is wrong with this review? A moderator reads every report.

We do not tell the author who reported them.
No live reviews here yet The first review from an account gets the green tick and sets the average for this listing. Write the first one
Have more to say? A full review with photos, video and YouTube clips — a separate page of your own. Write a full review
Write a review
Quality
Value for money

Photos and video can be attached from an account — Sign in

Guest reviews are published after moderation. Sign in to publish instantly.

What this page answers